No child porn was involved in this case dipshit.I love how you defend child porn without flinching
I just pray you don’t have a daughter
No child porn was involved in this case dipshit.I love how you defend child porn without flinching
I just pray you don’t have a daughter
You are a pathetic old rag.MAGA is a horrible way to bring men up
It ruins their ability to know the difference between crime and the laws society deems acceptable
Guns, hate, entitlement, compassion less thinking that denies any FACTS and the dignity of all others
Everyone understands this point. It's still political bullshit. Tell me the story of two ghetto dindus being prosecuted for something like this.The question would be if he had video. It isn't the sex that he was arrested for, it was the making of the video.
Funny you should ask. I remember a case.So if she releases the video herself now that she's not under age what's the status?
Can she be prosecuted for distributing child pornography of herself?Funny you should ask. I remember a case.
That's a very good question. She'd be both a perp and a victim.Can she be prosecuted for distributing child pornography of herself?
The motivation here is almost certainly political.....
The complaining victim clearly was not complaining for political reasons. He stalked her for three years. He sent a video of himself having sex with her to her current boyfriend, and threatened to send it to her parents and school. This is all upsetting whatever the political position of his mother.It's still political bullshit.
Arrest him and put that kid in jail.The complaining victim clearly was not complaining for political reasons. He stalked her for three years. He sent a video of himself having sex with her to her current boyfriend, and threatened to send it to her parents and school. This is all upsetting whatever the political position of his mother.
Yup, he should serve real time, if he were not in a MAGA family he would.The girl in question no longer wanted anything to do with him, so she threatened her with revenge porn, and then he followed through with that threat by sending the child porn to her boyfriend. This was beyond intentional.
IT is? Really?Man, you really love to try to walk that line... This is stepping a bit over into the accusing another poster of something. You need to step back.
Looks like that is incorrect.Basically. He was arrested for making and keeping a videotape of an underage person having sex.
I did it for 4 years, and it ended with a winning record, 0 complaints and a plaque on my wall.Isn't it true that the only time you ventured into that area of practice, it did not end well for you?
In some ways it is, his Justice Department removed his name thousands of times.I do. But I recognize the barrier that is in place, while you do not. The barrier is not Trump.
The distribution of child porn charges was not bullshit. Especially if he was blackmailing her.They are not. Again. It isn't the age difference, it is the video of a child having sex. Make the sex tape on her birthday and you'll be safe. Kids at school passing around photos of their girlfriends can be arrested for child pornography, even if they are the same age when they have sex.
If that is the law its bullshit, the studies show most 17 year olds have had sex.
I bet money there will be no trial, just a slap on the wrist because of who his mommy is.Now in the trial, the question will be "who caused the video to be made?" If they can make it so it appears that she set up the video thing, then he could walk.
I will say that this is a scenario where the letter and not the intent of law is being followed.
I did it for 4 years, and it ended with a winning record, 0 complaints and a plaque on my wall.
If two teenagers consensually film it, I do not necessary believe it should illegal, if it gets distributed I think the distribution should be illegal.No publicly available evidence from the case indicates that the girl was recorded surreptitiously (secretly, without her knowledge).
According to reporting on the arrest affidavit in the Garfield County, Colorado case against Tyler Boebert:
- The charges center on a roughly 43-second video allegedly showing Tyler Boebert (then 18) and a 17-year-old girl engaged in sexual activity in early 2024 (around late January or February 1, depending on the specific account). The material has been treated as child sexual abuse material under Colorado law because the girl was under 18.
- Tyler Boebert has acknowledged being the male in the video but denied recording it, claiming it was made without his knowledge.
- The girl (described in some accounts as his then-girlfriend or ex-girlfriend) told investigators that he made the video with her and sent a copy to her phone.
- Later developments included the video (or related material) circulating among peers or appearing on an Instagram account that also featured other explicit content involving minors. The girl’s mother or the girl herself reportedly brought the matter to authorities after learning a copy had reached others. The affidavit notes the video of Boebert and the girl was not necessarily posted online by him in the same way other material was.
Public summaries of the affidavit do not describe hidden cameras, secret filming, or any indication that the girl was unaware a recording was being made at the time. The accounts instead point to a dispute over who initiated or controlled the recording of an encounter both parties were participating in, followed by subsequent sharing. The case remains pending, and the full affidavit details (many of which are redacted in public reporting) have not been independently verified beyond news accounts of the court documents.
This is based on contemporaneous reporting of the charging documents as of the August 2026 arrest and related coverage.
![]()
New details emerge in child exploitation case against Lauren Boebert's son
Newly released court records are filling in the case against Tyler Boebert, the 21-year-old son of firebrand Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO), who was arrested Sunday on three felony charges of sexual exploitation of a child.According to an arrest affidavit obtained by The Denver Post, the...www.rawstory.com
If two teenagers consensually film it, I do not necessary believe it should illegal, if it gets distributed I think the distribution should be illegal.