Into the Night
Contributor
No.But is it weather manipulation?
I need to hear from fight weather experts.....it factors into whether this was negligence or not.
No.But is it weather manipulation?
I need to hear from fight weather experts.....it factors into whether this was negligence or not.
This type of jet probably had no recorders. It is not usual to require them.There are photos of the fire.
I wonder if whatever recorders were aboard survived.
The pilot didn't know the cell was there.This storm was massive as I understand it, they may not have taken on enough fuel to fly around it.
Approx 690mph (not very accurate yet, of course). This is an estimate by the NTSB.Maybe the fire does not matter......did you see the speed at which it hit?
Quite right. A typical pattern.The fires I saw, after the initial fireball, in the video were miniscule. Jet fuel burns a lot bigger than that and it doesn't take much to make big fire. Saw that first hand at firefighting school in the Navy.
They had enough fuel for another thousand miles according to their range, if they left with full tanksThis storm was massive as I understand it, they may not have taken on enough fuel to fly around it.
IF.They had enough fuel for another thousand miles according to their range, if they left with full tanks
They are not a beginner's aircraft. To fly one, you have to be type certified. This little jet has two engines mounted somewhat rearward, along with a T-tail. Both of these produce some interesting behaviors that you have to be trained to specifically handle. It's not particularly difficult, but you do have to be aware of it. Mostly it's about handling the speed and the loading, as well as complex avionics. Fortunately, you have a copilot to help you.Saw someone else on X say that Lears tend to be very unforgiving, which is interesting in this context.
Lawn dart. That wasnโt just an engine failure.At least 9 dead.
This is incredible....
![]()
![]()
An airplane with no engines running is a glider, even a jet. That thing dove into the ground at full speed. More like a catastophic control failure.They had enough fuel for another thousand miles according to their range, if they left with full tanks
They flew directly into the thunder storm , was their radar broken?An airplane with no engines running is a glider, even a jet. That thing dove into the ground at full speed. More like a catastophic control failure.
Air Transat Flight 236 was a transatlantic flight bound for Lisbon, Portugal, from Toronto, Canada, that lost all engine power while flying over the Atlantic Ocean in the dark on August 24, 2001. The Airbus A330ran out of fuel because of a fuel leak caused by improper maintenance.![]()
Air Transat Flight 236 - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
That would do it.I think it was on the local Fox News affiliate (which I was only watching because football and NASCAR was on all the other channels) the anchor froze the frame an instant before impact and speculated as to the possibility that the rear horizontal stabilizer might have been missing.
It certainly does look that way.....
View attachment 100221
I'll let the NTSB figure it out.Lawn dart. That wasnโt just an engine failure.
IDK, but Learjets are pretty tough. It would have to be a massive storm coupled with plenty of stupidity on the part of the pilots.They flew directly into the thunder storm , was their radar broken?
Theyโll use radar to track the aircraft altitudes and speeds plus look at weather radar at the time. Theyโll also go over the maintenance logs. The aircraft looked mostly intact, but as mentioned, but be missing the horizontal stabilizer or elevator which would cause the โlawn dartโ effect.I'll let the NTSB figure it out.
If they can ever find enough of it.
The Learjet has a history of tailplane icing. That would have the same effect as losing the horizontal stabilizer or elevators.Not if wings are iced