Live Feed: Trump's Defensive Argument
- Thread starter Diesel
- Start date
I'm shocked that CNN allowed this exposure of hypocrisy on the left to be published publicly. But, here it is in all it's glory. 
You fight...I fight...we all "fight" politically. We ask our Congressmen to FIGHT for us. It's nice to finally give full context
to statements that House managers edited out.
You fight...I fight...we all "fight" politically. We ask our Congressmen to FIGHT for us. It's nice to finally give full context
to statements that House managers edited out.
How is anyone in the chamber able to keep a straight face? I feel like I'm watching a high school production of A Few Good Men meets some John Grisham film adaptation.
Fox is on commercial break as this Ally McBeal motherfucker has a Pompeii eruption on the Senate floor.
I'm shocked that CNN allowed this exposure of hypocrisy on the left to be published publicly. But, here it is in all it's glory.
You fight...I fight...we all "fight" politically. We ask our Congressmen to FIGHT for us. It's nice to finally give full context
to statements that House managers edited out.
You already posted that. Don't spam my thread, cunt.
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Hello domer76,
No, it didn't come in very well, and WP prevents me from seeing their articles, but I was able to see that it has gone on for 13 months. That is how long Trump spent building 'The Big Lie.' More than a year of repeating the lie.
No, it didn't come in very well, and WP prevents me from seeing their articles, but I was able to see that it has gone on for 13 months. That is how long Trump spent building 'The Big Lie.' More than a year of repeating the lie.
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Hello Diesel,
I noticed the one gangster lawyer, Michael van der Veen, insinuated that the House evidence had been 'doctored.' I also noticed that the video presented by him had audio superimposed over the video which was not original audio (music.)
Also, Michael van der Veen claimed that the House Managers presented no evidence, when clearly they had. He specifically remarked about it himself.
I noticed the one gangster lawyer, Michael van der Veen, insinuated that the House evidence had been 'doctored.' I also noticed that the video presented by him had audio superimposed over the video which was not original audio (music.)
Also, Michael van der Veen claimed that the House Managers presented no evidence, when clearly they had. He specifically remarked about it himself.
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
An observation:
The House Managers and the defense have equal desk space to lay out their materials on.
The House Managers' desk is full; completely covered with materials.
The defense desk space is barely half used. Lots of empty desk space available; not needed.
The House Managers and the defense have equal desk space to lay out their materials on.
The House Managers' desk is full; completely covered with materials.
The defense desk space is barely half used. Lots of empty desk space available; not needed.
They have no defense. Frankly, what Trump did -- and who he is -- is indefensible.
Luckily, there are at least 34 coward-ass cunt GOP senators who will defend his right to kill them, so they don't need a defense.
Not true, they are showing a program called "the Five," and have been airing it since five o'clock
No, I offered an argument and am supporting it. You're repeatedly posting a YouTube clip. I hope you didn't breed before it shriveled up.
van der Veen is a two-bit lawyer who is probably trading his services for the TV time and a Trump Steaks dinner.
van der Veen is completely winging it. He looks and sounds like a first year law student who didn't read the assignment before he was called on in front of the class.
The House Managers are killing it. They listen to the first few words of each question and then dive into their notes. They separated their focuses. Someone knows where to find everything.
Yes, true. Fox was on a commercial break when I changed the channel.
Here are the first few paragraphs.
"The violence that erupted at the Capitol on Jan. 6 wasn’t born of a speech given that morning by President Donald Trump. It was, instead, a product of an effort that stretched back to the prior April — or, really, from before Trump was elected in the first place.
Before the 2016 election, Trump invested a decent amount of energy on claims that presidential elections were rife with voter fraud. It was transparently an effort to inoculate himself against what seemed to be a likely loss in that year’s presidential race. Then he won — and his claims that voter fraud were rampant were more narrowly tailored to explain why Hillary Clinton got nearly 3 million more votes than he did, or so they said."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...sinformation-trump-visualized/?outputType=amp