Majority Leader John Thune is holding a vote in the Senate to require voter ID nationwide in elections by law, a provision of the SAVE America Act

[Into the Night]

The 'voter purge' requirements they are pushing which would see States be required to remove the people from the voter rolls that the Federal gov't identifies.

Like illegal aliens, dead people, people that have moved out of the voting district, etc.

To allow the Federal gov't this type of power you have to first trust they are not targeting blue States and identified Dem voters, only for purges while ignoring Red states, and Republican voters. And two, that they won't weaponize this so close to the election that people will not have the time to appeal, or prove they are, in fact, eligible to vote.

States have no color, Kewpie.
False dichotomy fallacy.

Dead people are not eligible to vote (but 'vote' anyway).
People no longer in the jurisdiction are not eligible to vote (but 'vote' anyway).
False names are not eligible to vote (but 'vote' anyway).

 

[Into the Night]

Isn't it fascinating that the folks who screamed bloody murder about the "nanny" and "deep" state that wanted to run their lives? About state sovereignty are now clapping like seals at a gov't that wants control over individual state voter rolls IN SPITE of that being a direct violation of the Constitution?

It does not violate any constitution, Libby.
DON'T TRY TO HIDE BEHIND THE CONSTITUTION YOU DESPISE!

 

[Into the Night]

As i have said many times, Trump did us all a favor in way.

He exposed that never again should we take any magat issue or complaint or moral position seriously, like they actually care about it.

For magats it is 100% partisan, 100% of the time. If Trump says tomorrow, 'War will be non stop' or 'all gov't money is going to the rich', or 'pedophilia is ok and will be made legal', or 'Jesus was too woke', the magats would adopt those positions tomorrow. If Trump changed his mind the next day, they would follow and change.

I say that without an ounce of hyperbole. The magats are unethical shells, just waiting to be filled up by any hate filled leader who can feed them hate.

We need to remember that as there is nothing more to them than that and when they start whining and complaining the next time they have power, we should tell them to STFU and not pretend anything they say has meaning.

MAGA isn't a person, Kewpie.
Magats is not a word.
You are describing Democrats again.

 

[Into the Night]

Nope, fact

Argument of the Stone fallacy. Buzzword fallacy. No argument presented.

Go learn what 'fact' means, anchovies.

 

[Into the Night]

Safe Act, even the GOP Senators knew it was bullshit

Why are you opposed to photo voter ID, anchovies?
(There is only one reason).

 

[archives]

Argument of the Stone fallacy. Buzzword fallacy. No argument presented.

Go learn what 'fact' means, anchovies.

And still fact

 

[archives]

Why are you opposed to photo voter ID, anchovies?
(There is only one reason).

Because there is no need and the chance of depriving one of their right to vote doesn’t merit it, and please, spare us all the talk radio/fox/tweeting proof of voter ID fraud

 

[Into the Night]

And still fact

Go learn what 'fact' means, anchovies.

 

[Into the Night]

Because there is no need and the chance of depriving one of their right to vote doesn’t merit it, and please, spare us all the talk radio/fox/tweeting proof of voter ID fraud

Photo voter ID does not deprive of anyone except the illegal alien and fraudsters to vote, anchovies. Why do you want illegal aliens and fraudsters to vote?

What 'talk radio/fox/tweeting', anchovies?

Are you actually arguing you are too stupid to vote?

 

[archives]

Go learn what 'fact' means, anchovies.

Go learn what 'fact' means, anchovies.

And still fact

 

[archives]

Photo voter ID does not deprive of anyone except the illegal alien and fraudsters to vote, anchovies. Why do you want illegal aliens and fraudsters to vote?

What 'talk radio/fox/tweeting', anchovies?

Are you actually arguing you are too stupid to vote?

Sure it does if the voter can not obtain the required ID in time to vote especially if fhe requirements to get that ID are intentionally burdensome.

And why even go to that measure when Voter ID fraud is nearly nonexistent

 

[Into the Night]

And still fact

Go learn what 'fact' means, anchovies.

 

[Into the Night]

Sure it does if the voter can not obtain the required ID in time to vote especially if fhe requirements to get that ID are intentionally burdensome.

And why even go to that measure when Voter ID fraud is nearly nonexistent

So you are too stupid to vote.
You can't make any evidence just disappear, anchovies.

 

[Nordberg]

We have 100 percent ID shown when you registered to vote. I know Trump needs 400 or 600 percent ID.

 

[Yakuda]

Safe Act, even the GOP Senators knew it was bullshit

So you can't support your claim. We got a surprise

 

[archives]

Go learn what 'fact' means, anchovies.

And still a fact

 

[Into the Night]

And still a fact

Go learn what 'fact' means, anchovies.

 

[archives]

Go learn what 'fact' means, anchovies.

And still a fact

 

[Into the Night]

And still a fact

And still a fact

And still a fact

And still a fact

Mindless repetition. Repetition fallacy (chanting).

 

[evince]

I disagree.

The actual best example would that I register with the state I live in and show my ID at that time. Then my name would be on a state wide database of people eligible to purchase a gun. Then I go to the gun store and purchase a gun and I give them my name. They look up my name on the database and find it. I dont have to prove I am who I claim to be so they can just let me walk out the door with the gun, right?

Your disagreement with the power that democracy gives Americans is meaningless you little brother billo