Medicare For All a fiscal winner

You moron; that isn't a poll about how Americans feel about impeachment. It is about how they feel about opening the FAKE impeachment inquiry.

As usual, you're a clueless dumb fuck. ;)

Poll: a majority of Americans think House Democrats right to open Trump impeachment inquiry

Yes ma'am that is correct. I also said that 49% of Americans now favor impeachment.
 
Medicare for ALL includes illegals (non-citizens) who aren’t even supposed to be in our country.

A financial nightmare...totally unsustainable.
 
A “right to give birth” means that the baby, about to be birthed, has the right to be birthed.

A “Right to Life” position.
 
Then why are you responding to my thread?

Because you're so insecure, you can't handle someone making you look like a fool.

But then again, you are so fucking stupid, a reality TV show host conned you into voting for him.


aren't you supposed to be doing your homework

look nut**bags

Medicare for all is not "a fiscal winner" this isn't Canada, this is the USA

but you can go to Canada if you wish, socialized medicine, your baby
 
The real problem is pussies like you that refuse to do for yourselves and demand the government do it for you.

What do you do for sustenance??????????? Are you retired????? You're on this blog must of the day.
 
I sent you the USA Today story than had all the numbers and it also had a link to the poll. If you had bothered to read it you would have also read that 40% of Americans favor removal from office.

It wasn't a link regarding Americans opinions on impeaching presidents you moron. You might want to actually READ and COMPREHEND what you are reading before you bloviate ignorantly about things.

That was support of the FAKE INQUIRY; not on their views of Presidential impeachment. Dunce.
 
It wasn't a link regarding Americans opinions on impeaching presidents you moron. You might want to actually READ and COMPREHEND what you are reading before you bloviate ignorantly about things.

That was support of the FAKE INQUIRY; not on their views of Presidential impeachment. Dunce.

Its exactly what I said it was, including 40% of Americans we favor removal from office. Comprehende??
 
aren't you supposed to be doing your homework
look nut**bags
Medicare for all is not "a fiscal winner" this isn't Canada, this is the USA
but you can go to Canada if you wish, socialized medicine, your baby

I refer to the OP...the math is there. You have yet to even address it because you're too scared to.
 
I don't understand why many liberals complain about tax cuts and "subsidies" for business yet seek to give them a huge benefit by assuming the health care costs they now provide to their employees.
 
The vast majority of Democrats as well as all American citizens do not favor health insurance for those who are undocumented. However they can get treatment at a hospital any time they need it.


I'd rephrase that to White democrats and white American citizens...…………

Most minorities I know have no problem with healthcare for all including the undocumented.

That's why we can't move forward...……..white America always wants to exclude someone.

There's enough to go around for everyone.
 
I don't understand why many liberals complain about tax cuts and "subsidies" for business yet seek to give them a huge benefit by assuming the health care costs they now provide to their employees.

Did you bother with the math in the OP?

They're still assuming the health care costs (they're paying 7.5% on income like I linked to in the OP you obviously didn't read)....they're just not paying as much. So the $744K a business of 50 employees saves because it no longer has to provide sponsored care can be used any myriad ways; increasing wages, expansion, etc.

This is the weakest argument yet I've seen against the fiscal solvency of M4A, and how much it saves everyone.
 
I don't understand why many liberals complain about tax cuts and "subsidies" for business yet seek to give them a huge benefit by assuming the health care costs they now provide to their employees.

You obviously are lost when it comes to the question of why companies provide sponsored care in the first place.
 
This is the weakest argument yet I've seen against the fiscal solvency of M4A, and how much it saves everyone.

Nowhere did I make an argument against the fiscal solvency of M4A--read my post. It was a statement of the inconsistency between opposing a tax cut (or subsidy) for business yet assuming some of their cost of providing healthcare. Government is still providing financial benefits to business.
 
Back
Top