Name one purely capitalist Country?

A nation with no public sector would have no military, no police, no fire department, no public works.
All of those things are essentially socialism.
None of them are socialism.

All of the weapons, missiles, ammunition, communications systems, and even the food and uniforms of the military are produced using capitalism.
All the police cars, weapons, ammunition, rescue gear, and even the siren and lights, and the officer's uniforms are produced using capitalism.
All the fire trucks, the police and fire stations themselves, the 1st aid equipment, and the drugs and medical equipment is produced using capitalism.

Capitalism is not socialism.
 
You did not answer anything.
Lie. Denial.
Every example you gave, EVERY SINGLE ONE, i gave a list of citations PROVING they all, 100% utilized government and grants and bailouts to complete them.

You cannot isolate a single example that did not but go ahead and try again and i will again cite how you are wrong.
None did. No such citation.

All toll roads, highways, and freeways, are built by capitalism, Kewpie.
 
As radio talk show host and author Thom Hartmann once pointed out, the vast majority of Americans HAVE NO CAPITAL to speak of, so technically they are NOT capitalists. Note the following dictionary definitions:

Capitalist: a person who invests in trade and industry for profit in accordance with the principles of capitalism:

Capitalism: an economic and political system in which a country's trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit:
 
  • Like
Reactions: QP!
As radio talk show host and author Thom Hartmann once pointed out, the vast majority of Americans HAVE NO CAPITAL to speak of, so technically they are NOT capitalists. Note the following dictionary definitions:

Capitalist: a person who invests in trade and industry for profit in accordance with the principles of capitalism:

Capitalism: an economic and political system in which a country's trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit:
Roughly 45% of Americans have a 401K. That is a plan in which their retirement fund is invested in trade and industry for profit.

About 44% have an IRA (there is some overlap here but it isn't clear to what degree). Same thing.

About 58% own stock, mostly through the above plans.

About 55% of Americans have owned a business at some point in their life.

So, roughly a plurality of Americans (half) are Capitalists to one degree or another.
 
Roughly 45% of Americans have a 401K. That is a plan in which their retirement fund is invested in trade and industry for profit.

About 44% have an IRA (there is some overlap here but it isn't clear to what degree). Same thing.

About 58% own stock, mostly through the above plans.

About 55% of Americans have owned a business at some point in their life.

So, roughly a plurality of Americans (half) are Capitalists to one degree or another.
the dumb money peanuts fund.

lol.
 
ALL roads, tollways, freeways, and highways are built with capitalism.
Privately owned companies furnish the equipment, materials, and manpower to construct the road (and to maintain it).

Most roads are FUNDED by government.

The one I noted was not. It was a 100% private venture. And highly profitable.
 
You christ stains changed the original, it was only given to the Jewish people

images
1791033048807.png
 
None of these four highways were built exclusively with private funds, and they did not prove that the private sector could build a national road network without government assistance. NOT A SINGLE ONE!

---------

The fact and the history of these "auto trails" proves the exact opposite: private industry tried to fund them, realized it was impossible, and actively lobbied local, state, and federal governments to pay for the actual construction and maintenance. [1, 2]

The four roads mentioned—the Lincoln Highway, Jefferson Highway, Old Spanish Trail, and Dixie Highway—were part of the "Good Roads Movement" in the 1910s and 1920s. [1, 2]

Here is how the funding and construction actually worked:

1. The Role of Private Associations (Promotion, Not Paving)
The private entities involved (like the Lincoln Highway Association) were primarily promotional, mapping, and lobbying organizations, not construction companies. [1, 2]
  • Their founders—often automotive businessmen like Carl G. Fisher (who backed both the Lincoln and Dixie Highways)—wanted to encourage car ownership and tourism. [1, 2]
  • They mapped out routes using existing local dirt roads, came up with catchy names, and painted colored markers on telephone poles so drivers wouldn't get lost. [1, 2, 3]
  • When they did spend private money on construction, it was usually only for short "seedling miles" (sample strips of concrete or brick) designed to show local communities what a good road looked like so those communities would vote for tax bonds to pave the rest. [1]

2. The Early Pivot to Government Funding
The private sector abandoned the idea of self-funding these highways almost immediately because the costs were vastly underestimated. For instance, Carl Fisher initially estimated the Lincoln Highway would cost $10 million, but car magnates like Henry Ford refused to donate, arguing that funding public infrastructure was a fundamental role of government, not private business. [1, 2, 3]
As a result, the private trail associations shifted their main focus to lobbying state and local governments to construct and maintain the roads: [1, 2]
  • Local & County Taxes: Early sections were funded by county and state matching funds, often through voter-approved infrastructure bonds.
  • The Federal Government: Realizing local funding wasn't enough to connect the country, these associations heavily lobbied for the Federal Aid Road Act of 1916 and the Federal Highway Act of 1921, which pumped millions of dollars of federal taxpayer money into these specific routes. [1, 2, 3]

3. The Real Breakdown of the Roads

HighwayConceivedHow It Was Actually Paid For
Lincoln Highway1912The association gave up on private funding early. The vast majority of the road was built using local, state, and federal matching funds. It later became US 30, US 40, and US 50.
Jefferson Highway1915Formed by the Jefferson Highway Association, the project relied heavily on county bonds and state highway departments to improve the individual links. It was later absorbed into US 65, US 69, and US 71.
Dixie Highway1915Funded by a fragile coalition of individuals, businesses, local governments, and states, with the federal government providing massive funding in the 1920s. It eventually became US 25, US 31, and US 41.
Old Spanish Trail1915Initial funding was provided entirely by the states and counties through which the trail passed. Out of the roughly $80 million it cost to complete by 1929, the vast majority was government money. It was later replaced by US 90 and Interstate 10.

The 91 Express lanes were. 100% private funds. Post 149.

You lose.
 
I didn't see one. But you're right for once, for Russia is indeed on that list. Tell me, are
you hoping in the future that the Dems take control of the Senate, the House and the Presidency
all at the same time, say in 2029? If so, and if the dems do take control of all 3 branches, then
I'LL--WE will have to add another to that list of 6 Communist nations, and that of course would be
America.
Silly, not even their goal. You fell for it!
 
A: History time, class — and its interesting stuff.

The 91 Express Lanes opened in 1995, built by a private group, the California Private Transportation Co. because public funding wasn’t available, for $135 million with the 10-mile tollway rolling along inside the 91 Freeway in Orange County to the Riverside County line. There are two lanes each way.


In January 2003, the Orange County Transportation Authority bought the system for $207.5 million, using cash and bonds, bringing it into public ownership. Years later, the Riverside County Transportation Commission extended it into its turf.

Strictly private tollways are extremely rare and none are local. So Honk focused on the 91 Express Lanes’ finances for the Orange County section.



Sorry, you were saying?
Using government regulate roads, materials, eminent domain.

Additionally there was a government imposed non-compete clause. Something only the government could impose or grant.
“The private enterprise” required the toll lanes to be full in order to make a profit.

When the government stopped imposing the non-compete clause, the company profits quickly went negative and the State purchased the enterprise.

Please provide a link saying there was 0 government assistance?

AKA this “private company” was dependent on the government imposing a rule only government can impose,
 
Last edited:
Roughly 45% of Americans have a 401K. That is a plan in which their retirement fund is invested in trade and industry for profit.

About 44% have an IRA (there is some overlap here but it isn't clear to what degree). Same thing.

About 58% own stock, mostly through the above plans.

About 55% of Americans have owned a business at some point in their life.

So, roughly a plurality of Americans (half) are Capitalists to one degree or another.
The vast majority of stocks are owned by a few people.
 
  • Like
Reactions: QP!
Back
Top