Seems taxing million-dollar homes in NYC is only the beginning

None, but I also know that Europe has tried those sorts of taxes for decades now and the Rich either avoid them or leave the country for somewhere else. They haven't worked there, they won't work here.
Um dude


You are so worried about people who have enough wealth to own a vacation home in NYC


Why you fucking loser?

They are a tiny fraction of the American people

They won’t miss a meal or any broadway plays because of this tax


Let them fucking move

It frees up housing huh
 
Um dude


You are so worried about people who have enough wealth to own a vacation home in NYC


Why you fucking loser?

They are a tiny fraction of the American people

They won’t miss a meal or any broadway plays because of this tax


Let them fucking move

It frees up housing huh
I know you have a tenuous grasp of reality as it is, but...

I could care less about the rich. But I do prefer that government does what works, not what's fashionable on the Left, which never works. Taxing the Rich will not solve NYC's or NY state's money problems. History clearly shows that.

R.0e9c42aa233f663a350223cf3bd1a573
 
I know you have a tenuous grasp of reality as it is, but...

I could care less about the rich. But I do prefer that government does what works, not what's fashionable on the Left, which never works. Taxing the Rich will not solve NYC's or NY state's money problems. History clearly shows that.

R.0e9c42aa233f663a350223cf3bd1a573
Dear fucking idiot

Republicans keep lying us to war and causing economic crashes with deregulation to give gifts to the corporations


Fuck you very much
 

The 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s​



Over the next three decades, the top federal income tax rate remained high, never dipping below 70 percent.
 
Who says no new housing is the plan


He balences the budget

Set up services to make it more affordable for the working class to live in NY


And the right wing gets mad at him


They have no set morals

They only love their cult king

Ideas are meaningless to them

Success is meaningless to them

Only fat orange dying ass gets their approval
I'll repeat, at its core, proposals like this (in the OP) are an attempt for politicians to look like they are addressing affordability issues without building new housing.
 
I'll repeat, at its core, proposals like this (in the OP) are an attempt for politicians to look like they are addressing affordability issues without building new housing.
When you have housing standing empty most of the year

That is not good for the housing issue

So those people need to kick in more to help the city function

They don’t like it?

They can buy a house in Jersey

Then a year round resident will have a chance to buy it


Don’t want to live there?

It will cost you more to maintain

When you don’t live in a city you don’t end up paying all the taxes the residents pay

All the sales tax and such

You are not adding to the economy of the city

Just little dribs and drabs here and there

You love this city so much you buy a house here?

Then pay up

Very simple
 
None, but I also know that Europe has tried those sorts of taxes for decades now and the Rich either avoid them or leave the country for somewhere else. They haven't worked there, they won't work here.
Bullshit.

They work fine to make things fairer...despite the fact that you want to shout, "No they don't."

You still haven't answered the question(s).

Are you ever even going to give it the MAGA try>
 
When you have housing standing empty most of the year

That is not good for the housing issue

So those people need to kick in more to help the city function

They don’t like it?

They can buy a house in Jersey

Then a year round resident will have a chance to buy it


Don’t want to live there?

It will cost you more to maintain

When you don’t live in a city you don’t end up paying all the taxes the residents pay

All the sales tax and such

You are not adding to the economy of the city

Just little dribs and drabs here and there

You love this city so much you buy a house here?

Then pay up

Very simple
There are two people in my building that live bi-coastal (SF/NYC) and own residences in both. These guys run tech firms so they hire a number of people in each city as well as contribute a fair amount to the tax coffers. That they aren't in each City 365 days a year doesn't change that.

The idea that they are viewed negatively for doing so says more about us than them.
 
There are two people in my building that live bi-coastal (SF/NYC) and own residences in both. These guys run tech firms so they hire a number of people in each city as well as contribute a fair amount to the tax coffers. That they aren't in each City 365 days a year doesn't change that.

The idea that they are viewed negatively for doing so says more about us than them.
Negatively?

They are merely being asked to support the city in which their assets lie

Your brain is stuck on an idiot mode


Financially supporting democracy is BAD in your brain little butterfly
 
Negatively?

They are merely being asked to support the city in which their assets lie

Your brain is stuck on an idiot mode


Financially supporting democracy is BAD in your brain little butterfly
You're right Desh, people that create jobs and pay significant business taxes in a city aren't financially supporting democracy. My bad for thinking otherwise.
 
And you right wing idiots think balanced budgets are bad now


Because a brown Democratic Party member made it happen
Every Mayor in NYC is required to balance the budget. The federal government can run a deficit, NYC can't.

As with all cities and budgets, the devil is in the details. Was it done with smoke and mirrors such as pushing off pension payments, tapping into rainy day funds etc. or done on a more sustainable basis. That's what people who focus on the budget look at.

On the internet I suppose we focus on skin color.
 
Back
Top