‘There is NO GOD’ Stephen Hawking’s final revelation of the afterlife REVEALED

If Hawking posited a multiverse to escape the implications of a finite universe, that necessitates a beginning and perhaps a beginner—he is forced to believe in another entity that exists beyond the observable universe.

The irony speaks for itself.

There is no irony here. Someone who says they don't believe in God due to a lack of evidence is not in the same philosophical boat as someone who says they do believe in God even with no evidence.
 
There is no irony here. Someone who says they don't believe in God due to a lack of evidence is not in the same philosophical boat as someone who says they do believe in God even with no evidence.

obviously not since the boats are headed in opposite directions.....
 
That sure sounds convenient.

Sorry, but if you're applying logic, the need for a beginning is relevant to things both in & outside the physical plane.

only if I am applying YOUR logic......you assume a foundational premise that simply isn't there.......an entity outside of our physical universe simply does not have to be bound to the rules of our physical universe.....
 
It’s called a circular argument. Very popular among thumpers.

I can disregard a virgin birth. I can disregard a person walking on water, bringing back the dead, and a resurrection. I can disregard those children’s stories and still give credibility to Plato and Aristotle

Thumpers?:laugh: https://carm.org/manuscript-evidence
I repeat!
The New Testament is constantly under attack, and its reliability and accuracy are often contested by critics. If the critics want to disregard the New Testament, then they must also disregard other ancient writings by Plato, Aristotle, and Homer. This is because the New Testament documents are better-preserved and more numerous than any other ancient writings. Because they are so numerous, they can be cross checked for accuracy . . . and they are very consistent.

There are presently 5,686 Greek manuscripts in existence today for the New Testament.1 If we were to compare the number of New Testament manuscripts to other ancient writings, we find that the New Testament manuscripts far outweigh the others in quantity.2

One thing you will never be able to disregard is that one day EVERY KNEE WILL BOW EVERY TONGUE CONFESS JESUS AS LORD!
See God does not need you to believe for Him to exist.
 
Well, there you have it folks.

The true colors of so-called Christians being exposed to the light of day.

Apparently, the world's four billion Hindus, Daoists, Jews, Buddhists, and Agnostics are all going to burn in hell.

Also destined to burn in hellish flames for eternity: children and babies who either don't know any better, or have been taught a non-Christian faith.

In another century, fundamentalist Christians would have considered Steven Hawking's disability to be a sign of punishment from God, and might have even burned him at the stake.


Is there any group of people on the planet that enjoys and revels in sado-masochism , punishment, and retribution more than evangelical Christians?
I really think not.
 
Thumpers?:laugh: https://carm.org/manuscript-evidence
I repeat!
The New Testament is constantly under attack, and its reliability and accuracy are often contested by critics. If the critics want to disregard the New Testament, then they must also disregard other ancient writings by Plato, Aristotle, and Homer. This is because the New Testament documents are better-preserved and more numerous than any other ancient writings. Because they are so numerous, they can be cross checked for accuracy . . . and they are very consistent.

There are presently 5,686 Greek manuscripts in existence today for the New Testament.1 If we were to compare the number of New Testament manuscripts to other ancient writings, we find that the New Testament manuscripts far outweigh the others in quantity.2

One thing you will never be able to disregard is that one day EVERY KNEE WILL BOW EVERY TONGUE CONFESS JESUS AS LORD!
See God does not need you to believe for Him to exist.

:lolup::rofl2:

Quote from your pre-packaged Thumper site all you like. It doesn't make it true.

What do the Greek manuscripts say about a virgin getting pregnant?
About a half-man half-god?
About a man walking on water?
About a man coming back to life three days after his death?

Children's stories. Verify the historical accuracy of those stories, pally
 
There is no irony here. Someone who says they don't believe in God due to a lack of evidence is not in the same philosophical boat as someone who says they do believe in God even with no evidence.

But there is evidence lol.

Design is apparent throughout all of nature. In fact, all forms of evolution are an attempt to account for *apparent* design either in biology or cosmology. The best evidence indicates the universe is finite and had a beginning. Anything that begins to exist necessitates a beginning.

Theists posit an eternal God that exists outside of space and time as the beginner. Hawking appeals to an infinite multiverse that gave birth to this one.

The former group has tidier logic. The logic is pretty compelling, in fact.
 
Back
Top