Under pressure FBI Director Kash Patel claims agency has ‘evidence’ that 2020 election was stolen from Trump: ‘Stay tuned this week'

[evince]

Exactly. There's no way that he legitimately received over 81 million votes.

Yes, I realize that Democrats don't have anything good to vote for, and that they are driven by their hatred, but there's no way that over 81 million people voted against Trump.

You're right... it's not.

It just plain doesn't make any sense (outside of election fraud occurring) that voter turnout saw a truly historic spike for "Joe Biden" (who was the puppet for the Autopen that actually ran the show), even above and beyond the voter turnout spike that was seen for "Black Jesus" (Obama).

Then Trump gets a historic win in 2024 (77.3M votes), and that total is still 4M less than what Biden was claimed to have received (81.28M) even though the voting-age population grew. Why did many MILLIONS of "people" "turn out" for 2020 but "stay at home" for 2024? Why was there LESS turnout in 2024 than in 2020 (even though voting-age population grew)? Was Biden truly THAT much more loved than Kamala or Clinton or even Obama?

That is not evidence


Present your EVIDENCE!

 

[evince]

Hanging Chads were not voter fraud, dumbshit. They were fixed. No evidence of any significant fraud, it would take a large organized effort that would almost certainty be exposed.

And the actual count showed Gore won AFTER the SCOTUS gave the election to Bush

Then bush lied us to war in Iraq which created ISIS

THEN HE CRASHED THE WORLD WIDE ECONOMY

 

[evince]

It seems that Democrats ALREADY, sans "Black Jesus", can't win Presidential elections without election fraud.

Present your evidence!

 

[evince]

You mean fourth term.

Present your evidence!

 

[evince]

Do you realize we got here w/ Trump because you dolts elected a brain dead mummy in 2020 and then didn't even bother to have a democratic process to nominate a viable candidate after you could no longer pretend Brandon was lucent?
I guess not.

You get all the credit for trump so fuck you

 

[evince]

You wanna know what would go a long way in increasing my confidence in legitimate election results?

For starters:
Election DAY only... NOT "election week" (no early voting)
All votes must be counted on election day (no "counting ballots for days/weeks")
Nationwide ban on "ballot harvesting"
Paper ballots only
Nationwide voter ID requirement based on proof of citizenship
Nationwide requirement for everyone to re-register to vote every X years
Nationwide ban on drop boxes
Nationwide ban of "vote by mail" and "absentee voting" (except for those who are medically incapable of showing up in person)

First you have to prove your case of fraud

Present your evidence!

 

[evince]

Yup, maybe they should have put up a better candidate than a brain-dead puppet or a drunk cackling hyena.

They HAD Tulsi Gabbard in their camp, who I would've voted for, but nope... they decided to chase her away to the "MAGA camp" instead. I'd still happily vote for her. She's one of the good ones, and probably my favorite person in President Trump's cabinet.

All fucking lies

Present your evidence!

 

[evince]

You can't make a post on this or any other of your various boards w/out whining about MAGA. Nobody whines more about MAGA than you.
And then there's Damo's thread alone where you're at 200+ whines.

Whining?

No we are destroying MAGA with truth

You believe lies you won’t even tell us about

Present your evidence if you claim it’s true!

 

[evince]

I found him to be better than Sleepy Joe and Cackling Kamala, whatever that's worth, but he still wasn't my cup of tea.

Out of all the Democrats running in 2020, I was a Tulsi fan through and through. She's the only Democrat who I would have voted for in 2020.

You can have her

 

[evince]

Dutch whines even more than he barfs.

No one whines more than MAGA

You are perpetual victims

 

[ZenMode]

I think she is using gaslighting to dismiss a rational concern. You will also see, "no evidence of 'widespread' cheating" constantly repeated as a reason to dismiss the concerns and the requests for better reassurance, such as simple voter ID.

When you reject what 78% of voters think is reasonable, you need strong gaslighting programs.

There's two parts to this....

a) Is there anything wrong with requiring ID to vote? No.
b) Is there any reason to think it's needed due to uncovered fraud? No.

 

[evince]

But none of that is in place, and almost guaranteed never will be, so who knows...

What is the voter registration numbers in the US?


Do you fucking think there are 3 times more republicans?

 

[evince]

There's two parts to this....

a) Is there anything wrong with requiring ID to vote? No.
b) Is there any reason to think it's needed due to uncovered fraud? No.

Every study done has shown there is no need for your Republican bullshit about some imagined cheating


Shove your fascism up your ass

 

[evince]

About 70% of Democrats support the changes, about 85% of Republicans... This is a no brainer. I has nothing to do with the poster you hate, etc. It is about 80% of the population of the United States including unaffiliated voters, democrats, socialist morons, etc. support voter ID. Only the Confirmed Leftist religion doesn't want it.

Link

 

[Stone]

Present your evidence!

TOMORROW NIGHT. Then after that we JAM THRU the SAVE AMERICA ACT. I mean,...DUH,....what do you think tomorrow night is for?....DUMMY. TIMING is everything.... NO ONE CAN STOP WHATS COMING......

 

[Stone]

Present your evidence!

Tomorrow night. After that,....we fuck you over. Been a long time coming.......tic tic tic tic.

 

[evince]

Yes we know you are trying to fuck over the American people

 

[Stone]

 

[Lionfish]

There's two parts to this....

a) Is there anything wrong with requiring ID to vote? No.
b) Is there any reason to think it's needed due to uncovered fraud? No.

Part b is wrong. Many states only require one "legal" voter vouch for a handful of others and they all get to vote.
Then there is the whole discussion over ballot harvesting which was obvious in the LA mayors race. Hard to prove when the laws are constructed to allow such actions.

 

[Nomad]

I think she is using gaslighting to dismiss a rational concern. You will also see, "no evidence of 'widespread' cheating" constantly repeated as a reason to dismiss the concerns and the requests for better reassurance, such as simple voter ID.

When you reject what 78% of voters think is reasonable, you need strong gaslighting programs.

Most states require some form of ID. Those that don't use signature verification.

There is virtually no voter fraud in this country.

It's just another trump scam designed to get all you MAGA...



....to back him up.