White people set to become minority in US by 2050 - 13 years before Britain

Nomad said:
Yes, I'm aware of the Hispanic anomaly.

We Floridians heard quite a bit about how well trump did with Hispanic/latino voters in 2024.

They are partly/largely responsible for him carrying Florida.

Though I think most of them regret their choice now.
Click to expand...
I think that the Cuban Floridians are one of the most subversive and fascist ethnic groups in this country. They're descendants of pro-Batista refugees, and they regret nothing about their fascist political leanings because they've had them since they arrived here.
 
cawacko said:
As I understand the demographics = destiny argument, the more non-white the U.S. became it was going to be beneficial to the Democrats politically. They weren't discounting black voters, but it was really about the growth of Hispanic and Asian immigrants. And if these new Hispanic and Asian voters voted Democratic anywhere near the same level as black voters, then the Democrats were going to be extremely hard to beat.

What we've seen though is while Hispanic and Asian voters do lean Democratic, they are far from monolithic thus why we hear less of that demographics = destiny phrase from the Dem consultants.
Click to expand...
Take into account of the "old guard" Dem party that's holding onto status quo power and will downplay or sandbag any true progressive Dem candidates ( example being Bernie Sanders). But as folk die out and the population shifts, a change similar to what the Tea Party did to the GOP may occur
 
Taichiliberal said:
Take into account of the "old guard" Dem party that's holding onto status quo power and will downplay or sandbag any true progressive Dem candidates ( example being Bernie Sanders).
Click to expand...
That's because progressives are ridiculous ding-a-lings, nitwits, fruitcakes and self-interested crybabies who are not much better or different than their extremist MAGA shithead counterparts.
Taichiliberal said:
But as folk die out and the population shifts, a change similar to what the Tea Party did to the GOP may occur
Click to expand...

How'd that work out for us all, BTW ...?

1000095387.jpg
BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU WISH FOR!!!!
 
Taichiliberal said:
Take into account of the "old guard" Dem party that's holding onto status quo power and will downplay or sandbag any true progressive Dem candidates ( example being Bernie Sanders). But as folk die out and the population shifts, a change similar to what the Tea Party did to the GOP may occur
Click to expand...
If I understand your argument correctly, it is certainly possible that as America gets more diverse it (the Democratic Party) could become more progressive.

Where I could see pushback is going back to the demographics = destiny argument. That was never about whether these new non-white folks would be more progressive vs moderate Democrats, it was simply they would vote Democratic.

I'm not saying it can't happen, but the fact that many Hispanic and Asian voters have proven less predictably Democratic than expected is one reason I'm skeptical that demographic change alone will push the Democratic Party in a more progressive direction.
 
QP! said:
^^^

That is the number one thing the Supreme Court has been working to ensure does not lead to the US becoming a Minority Majority run country and they are willing to sacrifice the US Constitution and the country, if need be, to try and stop it.

Citizens United (endless corporate money in elections), plus all this radical gerrymandering is #1 reason for the US decent into a divided country tipping back towards civil war but what the Republican old guard recognized was that the best path forward for a new age of Republican rule, was to widen the tent, bring in black voters (mostly religious) and Latino's (also religious but also immigration concerns) and then start pushing some of them to leadership, drawing across Independent and Moderate/Right Dems who would shift.

For the hard core racist right that 'compromise' (supporting Tim Scott as POTUS, etc) is intolerable. Allowing the GOP to become a party ruled by PoC would be something they would never really escape due to demographic shift.

So instead they took what they knew and described as the nuclear option, known as the Southern Strategy. A strategy considered by prior GOP but considered too dangerous in the belief if they failed they would leave the country torn apart. But the SC has been paving that road and re-writing law and the Constitution to support it.

It is not hyperbole to say simply ruling that 'one man, one vote' would mean Politicians cannot pick their voters and thus non partisan voting commissions were Constitutional and needed would see the vast majority of todays polarization go away because for 9(% of the politicians to win primaries they would have to appeal the centrist voters and not the extreme. They would have use 'compromise and unite' language and not 'separate and fight'.

It is my view, this SC will go down in history as the biggest agent who tried to destroy the Constitutional order of the US in an attempt to keep America from being a majority, minority ruled country.
Click to expand...

Dumbest bit of racist idiocy I've read.
 
Taichiliberal said:
So explain to the reading audience why neo-nazis, KKK, white nationalist/ supremacist groups all have gone on record in support of the current Republican Party. We'll wait.
Click to expand...

Simple.

You're lying, as always.

Who are the Neo-Nazis that seek genocide of the Jews? Why YOU, the democrats.

1780499840010.png

The KKK goes by "BLM" now and is still the servant of their traditional master, the democrats.
 
AProudLefty said:
The correct way is:
Click to expand...

Let's test that, retard.

1780501702105.png

1780501839402.png

Yes, you are very ignorant. But in all fairness, I've had literally double the years of formal education that you have had. I'm published and had actual editors who combed over every word and punctuation mark.

You on the other hand, are barely literate.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top