I didn't think you'd admit it, and I was correct.
Awww, the poor little thing is frustrated that it can't dictate terms to forum members. Toughen up, snowflake.
I didn't think you'd admit it, and I was correct.
I like to imagine a world free of the likes of Oneuli, LV426, and Hillary Clinton.
So you say.
how freaking stupid are you "paying for people" - Single pay would be run by taxes - add in 3 million illegals who can' speak English with low job skills and they are an additional drain on the systemWhat are you fucking talking about? Paying for what? Paying for people? No, be more specific and say what the fuck you mean.
Wow. What a fucking fraud noise is...only a titanic fraud like noise would create myriad IDs to switch between.
we would be EXPONENTIALLY INCREASING THE SIZE OF THE GOVERNMENT and would beWe run a deficit and borrow, just like we have since the 1830's, except for that brief period of 1998-2001 when Clinton's tax increases produced surpluses and an economic boom.
They're not the ones putting the country at risk by voting in socialists because they mistakenly believed the Nordic model is socialist.
how freaking stupid are you "paying for people" - Single pay would be run by taxes
add in 3 million illegals who can' speak English with low job skills and they are an additional drain on the system
we would be EXPONENTIALLY INCREASING THE SIZE OF THE GOVERNMENT and would be
EXPONENTIALLY INCREASING DEFICIT SPENDING
Oh yea....countries throw out their political elite in favor of another just for shits and giggles. That's not what happened in Venezuela prior to Hugo Chavez.No, it's because they were promised the usual utopia, and got their own version of Tiananmen Square, instead.
I don't know how times I have to say the same damn thing, I am anti-Salifist. It is a pernicious doctrine that inspires and guides extremism. I live in Sheffield which has many Muslims and probably see more in a day than most on here in a year. I doubt that Desh has any understanding of the differences between Salifism and Sufism!! Maybe a video might help her?
I don't have access to the full text, but the abstract doesn't seem to support your statement. It says they found genetic diversity among indigenous populations within Mexico. It also says that there's a pre-Columbian genetic substructure to be found in the indigenous ancestry of mixed individuals. But none of that supports the statement. If you have access to the full study, could you copy and paste the bit that supports your claim?
Most here wouldn't. I live about half a mile from a local Mosque (in fact it's my voting precinct). If it wasn't for the women in head scarves you'd think it was just another Church.
Am I getting better or are you getting even worse?
I live about half a mile from a local Mosque (in fact it's my voting precinct). If it wasn't for the women in head scarves you'd think it was just another Church.
Of course, as opposed to private insurance, which is run by premiums that are at least $1T more expensive, according to Mercatus Center's M4A study.
Why would adding in more people suddenly burden the single payer system that is funded by payroll taxes? Don't understand what point you're trying to make. Virtually no one on Medicare pays taxes for Medicare today, and that system is the most popular in the country.
Yes, they were wrong. If you feel comfortable believing a falsity, go ahead.
-Anonymous, obscure message board poster Heff: "Scandinavia is NOT socialist!"
-Prominent national Republican political and media leaders: "Western Europe IS socialist!"
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...-soon-disappear-forever&p=3022790#post3022790
So your position is that your party leaders were wrong to call western Europe, Scandinavia, France, et al. Socialist?
You are questioning the judgement of your own party?
But, I have not heard actual Republican leaders like Mike Pence and Newt Gingrich admit they were wrong for relentlessly calling western Europe "socialist". You do not speak for them, and if they haven't admitted they were wrong, then I have to assume they are sticking with the assessment that Europe is "socialist.?
Their opinion - your party's opinion - carries more weight that yours.
The opinion of your party is that countries like Norway are socialist. They have not disavowed that position, or admitted they were wrong. So you opinion is meaningless. Norway - the socialist country in your party's opinion - is one of the most admired and respected socio-economic systems on the planet.