The US white majority will soon disappear forever

I like to imagine a world free of the likes of Oneuli, LV426, and Hillary Clinton.

Since you know we're out of your intellectual league, it makes sense that such fantasies would comfort you. But the thing is, when you're done cowering in your little game of make-believe, we'll still be here, making you look like a fool.
 
What are you fucking talking about? Paying for what? Paying for people? No, be more specific and say what the fuck you mean.

Wow. What a fucking fraud noise is...only a titanic fraud like noise would create myriad IDs to switch between.
how freaking stupid are you "paying for people" - Single pay would be run by taxes - add in 3 million illegals who can' speak English with low job skills and they are an additional drain on the system
 
We run a deficit and borrow, just like we have since the 1830's, except for that brief period of 1998-2001 when Clinton's tax increases produced surpluses and an economic boom.
we would be EXPONENTIALLY INCREASING THE SIZE OF THE GOVERNMENT and would be
EXPONENTIALLY INCREASING DEFICIT SPENDING
 
The proportion of whites in the U.S. population started to decline in 1950. It fell to gradually over the years, eventually reaching just over 60 percent in 2018 – the lowest percentage ever recorded.

Although the majority of the U.S. population today is still white, nonwhites account for more than half of the populations of Hawaii, the District of Columbia, California, New Mexico, Texas and Nevada. And, in the next 10 to 15 years, these half dozen “majority-minority” states will likely be joined by as many as eight other states where whites now make up less than 60 percent of the population.

Census Bureau projections show that the U.S. population will be “majority-minority” sometime between 2040 and 2050. Our research suggests that this will happen around 2044. Indeed, in 2020, there are projected to be more nonwhite children than white children in the U.S.


The nonwhite population is growing more rapidly than the white population. Minorities accounted for 92 percent of the U.S. population growth between 2010 and 2018, with Latinos comprising just under half of the nation’s overall growth.



https://www.houstonchronicle.com/lo...rity-will-soon-disappear-forever-13806738.php
 
They're not the ones putting the country at risk by voting in socialists because they mistakenly believed the Nordic model is socialist.

But they were wrong before.

So if they were so catastrophically wrong back then, as you said they were, what all of a sudden makes them right today?
 
how freaking stupid are you "paying for people" - Single pay would be run by taxes

Of course, as opposed to private insurance, which is run by premiums that are at least $1T more expensive, according to Mercatus Center's M4A study.


add in 3 million illegals who can' speak English with low job skills and they are an additional drain on the system

Why would adding in more people suddenly burden the single payer system that is funded by payroll taxes? Don't understand what point you're trying to make. Virtually no one on Medicare pays taxes for Medicare today, and that system is the most popular in the country.
 
we would be EXPONENTIALLY INCREASING THE SIZE OF THE GOVERNMENT and would be

How so? In what terms?

Most of what you post here are vague ambiguities designed to allow you maximum wiggle room in the debate.

Such a fraud.
 
EXPONENTIALLY INCREASING DEFICIT SPENDING

Which is what you guys just did with your Russia Tax Cut.

The deficit when Obama left office was $665.4B.

Today, the deficit is $984B.


So you're the ones exponentially increasing deficit spending when you cut revenues with your dumb tax cuts that don't deliver on any of the promises you made of them.

You're a fucking fraud. What you believe is total horseshit. Your convictions are meaningless. No one cares about you. You will die alone.
 
No, it's because they were promised the usual utopia, and got their own version of Tiananmen Square, instead.
Oh yea....countries throw out their political elite in favor of another just for shits and giggles. That's not what happened in Venezuela prior to Hugo Chavez.

Venezuela's government was a Capitalist Kleptocracy (much like the ones that abound in Africa) where the political class was stealing the vast majority of the revenue generated from the Petroleum industry and investing abroad in Swiss Bank Accounts and not in public institutions, infrastructure, education, government services or any sort of economic development. They just stole the wealth of the nation and left their citizens to starve when the economy collapsed when oil prices dropped.

What happened in Venezuela was that a Capitalist Kleptocracy was replaced with a Socialist Kleptocracy. Is anyone really suprized that both failed?
 
I don't know how times I have to say the same damn thing, I am anti-Salifist. It is a pernicious doctrine that inspires and guides extremism. I live in Sheffield which has many Muslims and probably see more in a day than most on here in a year. I doubt that Desh has any understanding of the differences between Salifism and Sufism!! Maybe a video might help her?


Most here wouldn't. I live about half a mile from a local Mosque (in fact it's my voting precinct). If it wasn't for the women in head scarves you'd think it was just another Church.
 
I don't have access to the full text, but the abstract doesn't seem to support your statement. It says they found genetic diversity among indigenous populations within Mexico. It also says that there's a pre-Columbian genetic substructure to be found in the indigenous ancestry of mixed individuals. But none of that supports the statement. If you have access to the full study, could you copy and paste the bit that supports your claim?

Naaa I'll leave you to pay for that or to do the work yourself. It's not BS and it's very easy to reference. The Spanish Conquest did produce a large Mestizo class in central Mexico (i.e. Tenochtitlan...aka Mexico City). However the general population of Southern Mexico remained predominantly Mayan and Northern Mexico remained predominantly Mexica. Shoot in many parts of Central Mexico Nauhatl is still spoken commonly. Same in the old Mayan regions. Mayan is still spoken.
 
Of course, as opposed to private insurance, which is run by premiums that are at least $1T more expensive, according to Mercatus Center's M4A study.

Why would adding in more people suddenly burden the single payer system that is funded by payroll taxes? Don't understand what point you're trying to make. Virtually no one on Medicare pays taxes for Medicare today, and that system is the most popular in the country.

If you want doctor care you have to pay for Part B which is taken out of your Social Security check. The 2019 Part B cost is $135.50 with a $185 deductible. The average premium for Part D (prescriptions) is $33.19.

Private insurance companies are very much involved in Medicare.
 
Yes, they were wrong. If you feel comfortable believing a falsity, go ahead.

So your position is that your party leaders were wrong to call western Europe, Scandinavia, France, et al. Socialist?

You are questioning the judgement of your own party?

But, I have not heard actual Republican leaders like Mike Pence and Newt Gingrich admit they were wrong for relentlessly calling western Europe "socialist". You do not speak for them, and if they haven't admitted they were wrong, then I have to assume they are sticking with the assessment that Europe is "socialist.?

Their opinion - your party's opinion - carries more weight that yours.

-Anonymous, obscure message board poster Heff: "Scandinavia is NOT socialist!"

-Prominent national Republican political and media leaders: "Western Europe IS socialist!"

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...-soon-disappear-forever&p=3022790#post3022790

The opinion of your party is that countries like Norway are socialist. They have not disavowed that position, or admitted they were wrong. So you opinion is meaningless. Norway - the socialist country in your party's opinion - is one of the most admired and respected socio-economic systems on the planet.
 
So your position is that your party leaders were wrong to call western Europe, Scandinavia, France, et al. Socialist?

You are questioning the judgement of your own party?

But, I have not heard actual Republican leaders like Mike Pence and Newt Gingrich admit they were wrong for relentlessly calling western Europe "socialist". You do not speak for them, and if they haven't admitted they were wrong, then I have to assume they are sticking with the assessment that Europe is "socialist.?

Their opinion - your party's opinion - carries more weight that yours.



The opinion of your party is that countries like Norway are socialist. They have not disavowed that position, or admitted they were wrong. So you opinion is meaningless. Norway - the socialist country in your party's opinion - is one of the most admired and respected socio-economic systems on the planet.

That's the most retarded thinking I've heard today.

You're going to elect avowed socialists because of your mistaken belief that Norway is socialist. It's going to ruin the country like it has countless others. That's on your party.
 
Back
Top