If you are excluding yourself from that "we" you are admitting you are an idiot.Creepy,
who is we?
If you are excluding yourself from that "we" you are admitting you are an idiot.Creepy,
who is we?
Correct, but not for the reasons you think.This is disgraceful.
We're at a low point in our history.
That doesn't change the facts of the case.Trump was charged like a normal person after a Grand Jury said there was a case. He had a staff of high-priced lawyers. He was given every break that money could buy. He acted up in court and got away with it. He held press conferences after the days he showed up and told lies about what was going on. Nobody else could have gotten away with that. He was quickly found guilty by a jury.
Another stupid, undereducated leftist chimes in from the echo chamber. Dismissed.Is there anyone out there who dared criticize or spoke out against Trump that hasn’t been sued, “investigated” or indicted?
Democrat DOJ's turn a blind eye to leftist criminals and engage in tyrannical lawfare against We the People who simply disagree with Democrat fascist socialism.What chance is there of a DOJ doing this if Trump were not President?
You're right, it doesn't. What facts of the case are not personal to the litigants?That doesn't change the facts of the case.
Was it egregious because Trump was found by a jury to have sexually assaulted someone?Oh bullshit, the Carroll case was one of the most egregious cases in history.
The facts that a jury had that voted GUILTY to every charge? Those the facts you're talking about?That doesn't change the facts of the case.
It was in the sense that NY state changed their laws specifically to create a wind to allow this case to come forward at all, and in doing that colluded with anti-Trump parties to make it happen.Was it egregious because Trump was found by a jury to have sexually assaulted someone?
It is pretty egregious that a rapist is now the US President.
In the E Jean Carroll case, it was a civil suit. There was no "guilty" verdict, just one of being libel.The facts that a jury had that voted GUILTY to every charge? Those the facts you're talking about?
This has nothing to do with the president of the United States using his own DOJ to attack a woman he raped. Also has nothing to do with the "merits" of DOJ's case against Carroll.It was in the sense that NY state changed their laws specifically to create a wind to allow this case to come forward at all, and in doing that colluded with anti-Trump parties to make it happen.
It's 100% egregious that trump is using our tax dollars to go after his own personal enemies. It's an unprecedented abuse of presidential power. The fact you're ignoring that shows what an idiot and total pile of shit you've become.It is pretty egregious that a state run by Trump hating Leftists would deliberately collude to use the legal system in an attempt to cripple and stop their political opposition, but that IS how the Left rolls worldwide.
Yea, Trump wants revenge. Okay, I can go with that as a big NO. But you have to admit the Democrats, Left, and politicians in NY started this shit with him and couldn't deliver. Now he's after fucking them back for it. I get that, but that doesn't mean I agree with it.This has nothing to do with the president of the United States using his own DOJ to attack a woman he raped. Also has nothing to do with the "merits" of DOJ's case against Carroll.
It's 100% egregious that trump is using our tax dollars to go after his own personal enemies. It's an unprecedented abuse of presidential power. The fact you're ignoring that shows what an idiot and total pile of shit you've become.
It's like because you are in a cult, you have no concept of time or reality.It was in the sense that NY state changed their laws specifically to create a wind to allow this case to come forward at all, and in doing that colluded with anti-Trump parties to make it happen.
Your inability to understand that Trump lost the defamation suits and would have lost them even if he hadn't been sued for sexual battery would indicate you are in a cult.It is pretty egregious that a state run by Trump hating Leftists would deliberately collude to use the legal system in an attempt to cripple and stop their political opposition, but that IS how the Left rolls worldwide.
I want the bar associations to get serious and start taking these people license to practice law.![]()
Justice Department opens investigation into E. Jean Carroll, who accused Trump of assault: AP source
The Justice Department has opened an investigation into whether longtime advice columnist E. Jean Carroll lied during the course of civil litigation against Donald Trump, who Carroll says sexually assaulted her in a New York department store 30 years ago.apnews.com
Is there anyone out there who dared criticize or spoke out against Trump that hasn’t been sued, “investigated” or indicted? The DOJ ought to just move to MaraLago and drop the facade
The Department of Justice’s mission statement says, “The mission of the Department of Justice is to uphold the rule of law, to keep our country safe, and to protect civil rights,” to which they ought to add, “and to investigate, indite, and prosecute anyone Trump tells us to as our top priority
One of the first steps of an autocrat is to silence his critics
if you were not lying about the case and what NY State did then perhaps what you say would have merit but since i see Richard already called you out for your misrepresentations and irrelevant statements i will allow you to reply to him.It was in the sense that NY state changed their laws specifically to create a wind to allow this case to come forward at all, and in doing that colluded with anti-Trump parties to make it happen.
It is pretty egregious that a state run by Trump hating Leftists would deliberately collude to use the legal system in an attempt to cripple and stop their political opposition, but that IS how the Left rolls worldwide.
To be clear, a jury jury found Trump liable for sexually abusing E. Jean Carroll and for defamation.In the E Jean Carroll case, it was a civil suit. There was no "guilty" verdict, just one of being libel.