“DOJ opens investigation into E. Jean Carroll”

This bit from the story is especially rich:

"The perjury investigation is being led by the federal prosecutors’ office in Chicago, and acting Attorney General Todd Blanche has had no involvement because of his prior work as Trump’s personal attorney, the person said."
 
Trump was charged like a normal person after a Grand Jury said there was a case. He had a staff of high-priced lawyers. He was given every break that money could buy. He acted up in court and got away with it. He held press conferences after the days he showed up and told lies about what was going on. Nobody else could have gotten away with that. He was quickly found guilty by a jury.
That doesn't change the facts of the case.
 
Is there anyone out there who dared criticize or spoke out against Trump that hasn’t been sued, “investigated” or indicted?
Another stupid, undereducated leftist chimes in from the echo chamber. Dismissed.

Nobody has been sued, investigated or indicted for criticizing Trump. Not only is the left incapable of being honest, they are compelled to be totally absurd and irrational.
 
Was it egregious because Trump was found by a jury to have sexually assaulted someone?
It is pretty egregious that a rapist is now the US President.
It was in the sense that NY state changed their laws specifically to create a wind to allow this case to come forward at all, and in doing that colluded with anti-Trump parties to make it happen.

It is pretty egregious that a state run by Trump hating Leftists would deliberately collude to use the legal system in an attempt to cripple and stop their political opposition, but that IS how the Left rolls worldwide.
 
It was in the sense that NY state changed their laws specifically to create a wind to allow this case to come forward at all, and in doing that colluded with anti-Trump parties to make it happen.
This has nothing to do with the president of the United States using his own DOJ to attack a woman he raped. Also has nothing to do with the "merits" of DOJ's case against Carroll.
It is pretty egregious that a state run by Trump hating Leftists would deliberately collude to use the legal system in an attempt to cripple and stop their political opposition, but that IS how the Left rolls worldwide.
It's 100% egregious that trump is using our tax dollars to go after his own personal enemies. It's an unprecedented abuse of presidential power. The fact you're ignoring that shows what an idiot and total pile of shit you've become.
 
This has nothing to do with the president of the United States using his own DOJ to attack a woman he raped. Also has nothing to do with the "merits" of DOJ's case against Carroll.

It's 100% egregious that trump is using our tax dollars to go after his own personal enemies. It's an unprecedented abuse of presidential power. The fact you're ignoring that shows what an idiot and total pile of shit you've become.
Yea, Trump wants revenge. Okay, I can go with that as a big NO. But you have to admit the Democrats, Left, and politicians in NY started this shit with him and couldn't deliver. Now he's after fucking them back for it. I get that, but that doesn't mean I agree with it.
 
It was in the sense that NY state changed their laws specifically to create a wind to allow this case to come forward at all, and in doing that colluded with anti-Trump parties to make it happen.
It's like because you are in a cult, you have no concept of time or reality.
E Jean Carroll filed her defamation suit in Nov of 2019.
The Adult Survivors Act was passed in May of 2022. After the act passed Carroll filed a second suit for sexual battery and further defamation.
Because the first suit was on appeal as to whether Trump defamed Carroll as a federal employee, the second suit went to trial first.
Carroll only received 2.02 million for the sexual assault. Between the two cases she received 84 million for the defamation.

The jury would have to have found that Trump had sexually assaulted Carroll for the defamation to have occurred since truth is a defense in defamation trials. The passage of the ASA didn't change the facts of the case, it only allowed Carroll to collect damages for the assault as well as the defamation.
It is pretty egregious that a state run by Trump hating Leftists would deliberately collude to use the legal system in an attempt to cripple and stop their political opposition, but that IS how the Left rolls worldwide.
Your inability to understand that Trump lost the defamation suits and would have lost them even if he hadn't been sued for sexual battery would indicate you are in a cult.
 

Is there anyone out there who dared criticize or spoke out against Trump that hasn’t been sued, “investigated” or indicted? The DOJ ought to just move to MaraLago and drop the facade

The Department of Justice’s mission statement says, “The mission of the Department of Justice is to uphold the rule of law, to keep our country safe, and to protect civil rights,” to which they ought to add, “and to investigate, indite, and prosecute anyone Trump tells us to as our top priority

One of the first steps of an autocrat is to silence his critics
I want the bar associations to get serious and start taking these people license to practice law.
 
It was in the sense that NY state changed their laws specifically to create a wind to allow this case to come forward at all, and in doing that colluded with anti-Trump parties to make it happen.

It is pretty egregious that a state run by Trump hating Leftists would deliberately collude to use the legal system in an attempt to cripple and stop their political opposition, but that IS how the Left rolls worldwide.
if you were not lying about the case and what NY State did then perhaps what you say would have merit but since i see Richard already called you out for your misrepresentations and irrelevant statements i will allow you to reply to him.
 
In the E Jean Carroll case, it was a civil suit. There was no "guilty" verdict, just one of being libel.
To be clear, a jury jury found Trump liable for sexually abusing E. Jean Carroll and for defamation.

It was made clear that this finding of SEXUAL ABUSE was synonymous with RAPE and was only distinguished differently as NYS used an old and outdated definition that defined only penetration by penis as rape, while use of fingers and objects was not. In almost all other States and Federally Trump would have been found to have raped her as they used the more appropriate definition.

When Trump was then looking to sue E Jean for using the word rape and it went back to the Judge he then ruled that the jury found conduct that amounted to rape as many people understand the word, and thus Carroll’s public statements that Trump “raped” her were substantially true for purposes of the defamation claims.

Judge Kaplan later wrote that this did not mean Trump had been “cleared” of rape in the ordinary-language sense.


"The jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that”
— meaning rape as commonly understood. cite

Appeals courts upheld the verdicts
 
Trump was given a trial. He had all the advantages that money can buy in America. In no way was he cheated. He had more than a fair trial. He one slanted his way. If you were accused like him, you would not have a huge staff of high priced lawyers. You would not be permitted to act up as Trump did defiantly. This is still America, and the rich get breaks you cannot imagine. The jury saw all the evidence and voted guilty unanimously and quickly,
 
Back
Top