Yakuda
Verified User
Doesnt change anything I said. The stupid bitch had no idea when this alleged rape happened.
“DOJ opens investigation into E. Jean Carroll”
- Thread starter archives
- Start date
No "Criminal" investigation.
You're all worked up over nothing.
Yakuda
Verified User
I dont think its nothing when a state legislature changes the law so civil charges against a sitting president and then the stupid bitch cant even remember when the supposed rape happened. Maybe its not illegal but its fucking sleazy as hell and it weaponizes the legal system against a political opponent. Its something low life would do...oh wait
You dont think Blanch does what The PP tells him to do?
Who's "Blanch"?
So you are assuming she is guilty
Nothing new here that wasn’t known, even the role of the suspected backer has been examined, and last I knew the DOJ wasn’t the President’s personal law firm, if Trump feels there is an illegality here let him open a case, he’s gat an army of attorneys
Now the DOJ reopening investigations of personal lawsuits against the President is a new rule? Since when? Last I knew the DOJ was not the President’s personal law firm
Is "the DOJ reopening investigations of personal lawsuits against the President", Anchovies?
TA's claim is that the act was passed specifically to prosecute trump. Poor guy, he's such a trumptard fanboy.
Any jury and judge who convicts Trump are "libtard juries" and "activist judges". That's how trumptards pretend to care about the law. The law only matters to trumptards when it's a Democrat under investigation.
Is it not?
Teflon Don
I'm back baby
That’s the rule after all your side did with Trump.
QP!
Verified User
What about what your side did with Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton and then Obama and their administrations?
Sure all those non stop investigations and Special Prosecutors all failed proving all the investigations were bogus, where the Trump ones and his Admin resulted in a boat load of convictions proving they were justified, but still, based on your logic the Trump stuff was all deserved right?
Trump is a law-breaking self-serving prick. He is 34 time guilty felon who delayed sentencing until he got presidential protections. He was guilty of stealing a truckload of classified documents and lying to the FBI and Archives as he tried to hide them. He organized a plot to have fake electors submit fake electoral documents to steal the election. He tried to get Republican election officials to give him more votes so he could steal the election. He organized an insurrection to try to prevent the certification of the Electoral College vote.
Trump is a horrible person who nobody should have voted for. He is the biggest liar in politics by far, You can never take what he says seriously, because he sure doesn't.
Your statement is a mix of verified facts, legally dropped or unproven criminal allegations, and strong personal political opinions.
Because you blended verified public record with highly subjective labels and legal nuances, it cannot be categorized as a purely "factual statement."
A detailed, factual breakdown of each claim within the statement is structured below.
"He is (a) 34 time guilty felon"
Fact Check: True. In May 2024, a New York jury unanimously found Donald Trump guilty of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records.
"He tried to get republican election officials to give him more votes"
Fact Check: True. During a recorded January 2021 phone call, Trump explicitly pressured Georgia’s Republican Secretary of State, Brad Raffensperger, to "find 11,780 votes" to overturn Joe Biden's victory in the state.
The Legally Complex or Misrepresented Claims
"Delayed sentencing until he got presidential protections"
Fact Check: Partially Misleading. While Trump's legal team successfully filed numerous appeals that pushed back his sentencing, the ultimate outcome was decided by the court. In January 2025, Judge Juan Merchan sentenced Trump to an "unconditional discharge," meaning he faces no prison time, fines, or probation, largely to avoid interfering with the duties of the presidency. Trump has since appealed to have the entire conviction overturned.
"Guilty of stealing a truckload of classified documents and lying to the FBI and Archives"
Fact Check: Legally Inaccurate. While the FBI did recover boxes of highly classified documents from his Mar-a-Lago resort, Trump was never found guilty of these charges. The federal classified documents case led by Special Counsel Jack Smith was entirely dismissed by a federal judge in July 2024 and officially closed by an appeals court.
"Organized a plot to have fake electors submit fake electoral documents... organized an insurrection"
- Fact Check: Unproven / Dropped Allegations. Trump was never criminally convicted of organizing an insurrection or stealing the election. Furthermore, all related criminal charges against him—including the Georgia election interference case—were officially dropped or dismissed by late 2025 election. Furthermore, all related criminal charges against him—including the Georgia election interference case—were officially dropped or dismissed.
The sentences listed below are opinions and value judgements, which cannot be classified as objective facts:
- "Trump is a law-breaking self-serving prick."
- "Trump is a horrible person who nobody should have voted for."
- "He is the biggest liar in politics by far..."
QP!
Verified User
A whataboutism that is illustrative to the topic is a perfectly appropriate reply.What about . . . ?
@Teflon Don is pushing a position that this is now justified because of what he perceives as unjust investigations in to Trump by his own DoJ in his first term and the Biden DoJ after.
If we accept that position then all the investigations into Trump were justified by the non stop investigations of Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton and Obama and thus Teflon Don's entire complaint goes away.
You only make that case by pointing 'whatabout' was done to them.