The difference between you and me, is that you leaped out of your chair to a foregone conclusion based on almost no evidence, and relying on guesswork, conjecture, and extrapolation.
I suspect your position is always - and I mean always - predicated on what is best for Trump, either directly or indirectly.
I am willing to let Assuage have his day in court and give his side of the story.
I am prepared to accept the Ecuadorians were "out to get him" if that claim is supported by the weight of evidence provided.
But I am also prepared to believe the Ecuadorians account that Assuage was a spoiled, ungrateful brat, who abused the privileges Ecuador extended to him.
The bottom line is that is nothing but a side show you are attempting to float.
Your fixation on Ecuador is irrelevant.
The issue is what, if any, U.S. laws Assuamge broke, and the U.S. courts apprerently have determined there is probably cause to believe he broke American law.
If you don't like American laws, you are free to elect represenatives committed to changing them.