They are more humanitarian than you and me. That doesn't make them the enemy like those supporting the fucking Soviets.
It makes them worthless doormats.
They are more humanitarian than you and me. That doesn't make them the enemy like those supporting the fucking Soviets.
My father, aunt, grandmother, and grandfather lived under a Japanese military occupation and had their house confiscated by officers of the Kwangtung Army.We absolutely know it.
You are absolutely ignorant of what the Japanese ethos was!! .
<snip>
the Soviets are LONG GONE.They are more humanitarian than you and me. That doesn't make them the enemy like those supporting the fucking Soviets.
We do know it took TWO bombs for Japan to bend the knee. If Japan was killing American GI's they would have likely continued fighting in a land invasion.People toss that saving a million lives around like it is established fact.
We do not actually know what would have happened.
I think there is a lot of evidence the Japanese were prepared to fight on. But we will never truly know.
Not if the majority were like us. I do not support war. I never have. I have been a pacifist my whole life. I will die a pacifist.
Yes. You would be in some Slave Labor Camp. Sucking your thumb. Wondering "Why didn't somebody do something?".
If people were like Cypress and myself, there would be no war.
it is an INSANE concept. Only a brain dead arrogant asshole would even speak it
I respect the moral principle implied by your opinionIt was reprehensible. We are the only nation who has used a weapon of mass destruction to kill civilians. We didn’t use it on troops, we used it on men, women and children.
Not if the majority were like us. I do not support war. I never have. I have been a pacifist my whole life. I will die a pacifist.
I’m very sorry. It’s why I hate war. The civilians suffer because of the egos of the leaders who sit in their comfortable places and decide what happens to the rest of us.My father, aunt, grandmother, and grandfather lived under a Japanese military occupation and had their house confiscated by officers of the Kwangtung Army.
On the one hand, the argument can be made that it was morally reprehensible, but it was the least bad of a range of bad options.
On the flipside, it could be argued it crossed a line which should never be crossed.
we were not at war with Russia - i have no idea what Patton wanted. It's too bizarre to even debateGen. Patton wanted to do it and from the limited perspective of a battlefield commander, it made sense.
But it failed to take into account the consequences.
Look at how America is resented or hated by many peoples and governments of the world today and try to imagine the enthusiasm there would be among the countries and peoples of the world to join forces to defeat US if we had done such a thing.
And what would we be forced to do to protect ourselves from them?
We would have had to become the monsters that many say we are today, but the reality would have been worse and it would be true and not just a puffed up accusation by air heads who know nothing.
Not if the majority were like us. I do not support war. I never have. I have been a pacifist my whole life. I will die a pacifist.
So the Japanese could shoot down our bombers?
the Soviets are LONG GONE.
your Goldwater brain is stuck in 1964
That's good, but unreasonable to expect from people as this forum constantly proves. It's not simply a matter of conditioning people to be pacifists since, like "brainwashing", that's only a temporary fix before their individual natures take over again.
Without genetic manipulation and conditioning programs, it's as unreasonable to expect we can stamp out war as the Stalin and Mao thought they could stamp out religion.
Not if the majority were like us. I do not support war. I never have. I have been a pacifist my whole life. I will die a pacifist.
I know I’m an idealist, but it is my type that keep humans, humane. I will always hope that we embrace our better nature.
I wasn't there in 1945, and I would never want to be in the position to make the decision. We all have the luxury of hindsight, looking back at it from a distance of 77 years.
My instinct leans towards feeling that while it was morally reprehensible, it may have been the least bad option. USA, Britain, Germany, USSR deliberately killed a lot of civilians from 1939 to 1945. All of it, strictly speaking, was morally reprehensible.
Typical warmongerHopefully no Americans are forced to die due to your pacifism.
And if you don't understand how that would even be possible, that shows why you don't yet grasp the consequences of pacifism and why it may be a comforting conceit (somewhat in the same way that Marxism is a comforting conceit) but it is suicide or surrender for a nation.