"How do you define socialism personally?"

T. A. Gardner said:
I'm not the one trying to defend my position by appeals to authority (a logical fallacy) and the use of insults and ad hominem, you are.

Demonstrate where my definitions and discussion are wrong. That means going beyond posting a link to an encyclopedia or dictionary and actually demonstrating you understand what Socialism is, because you clearly do not at this point and are only parroting what the dictionary says.
Click to expand...
T. A. Gardner said:
I'm not the one trying to defend my position by appeals to authority (a logical fallacy) and the use of insults and ad hominem, you are.

Demonstrate where my definitions and discussion are wrong. That means going beyond posting a link to an encyclopedia or dictionary and actually demonstrating you understand what Socialism is, because you clearly do not at this point and are only parroting what the dictionary says.
Click to expand...
I didn’t read them

Because you only used part of the definition
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Not Socialism.
Click to expand...
Stop ducking the question Terry.

Here is YOUR definition of socialism...


T. A. Gardner said:
Okay. Socialism is a system of economics that requires a political dictatorship to enforce a set of rules that defy human nature. In essence, the mob takes from the productive and gives to the unproductive in forced altruism on the population. The result is an oppressive political system leads the nation to economic ruin. There is nothing "democratic" or "fair" about Socialism.
Click to expand...

QP! said:
Which Democratic who has held power matches your definition of socialism, Terry?
Click to expand...
 
Yakuda said:
Of course it did. Ill type slowly for you this time. Why should we give a shit what anyone's personal definition of socialism is? Socialism already has a definition.
Click to expand...
It was a person high in the government redefining it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top